In Lisa Nielsen’s blog above a great debate is brought up on whether kids should have cell phones in school.
Agree with Lisa, that it is far less detrimental to allow students to utilize the technology they have available to them, rather than stifling it.
The best quote I got out of the article was one she made from a fellow blogger/tweeter Kevin Honeycutt, “”Students used to pass notes on paper. We never banned paper.”
Not only have kids been passing notes, but making paper airplanes that disrupt the class, or simply balling up paper and throwing it around the room. Ultimately it’s highly drastic to eliminate paper because of these distractions, so we teach students to be responsible with it.
Then the argument is made about cheating. I completely agree that if a test or exam is easy enough for a student to either text a friend, or look up the answer then the test needs to change. Teacher’s use scantrons for tests because it’s easier to grade and it resembles the standardized test they will take in the future. Of course with all the ease of multiple choice scantron tests comes the same ease in cheating. In the end kids don’t need phones to cheat. Cheating happened well before the digital age and will occur well into it. Teaching a student early on the value of their own work and the work of others will hopefully teach them why cheating and plagiarism is bad and not just against the rules.
Keeping kids “safe” is no longer a good enough excuse for banning personal technology. In a world where they will most likely be using cell phones and computers in their daily professional life, they must learn to be responsible with technology not just kept away from it.
There’s a big bad world out there, the job of schools and teachers is to prepare them for it, not shy them away from it.
After watching Salman Khan’s video on Ted.com:
I really got a new perspective on learning and the importance of the “interactive” role of a teacher.
Is this really the most productive role of a teacher in a class?
Is this the most productive time for a teacher?
I would imagine most people would say something like the images below are more appropriate uses of a teacher’s time.
One of the points that Salman Khan makes in the video I agree with wholeheartedly. The most important part of a teacher’s time is working with a student personally and finding more individualized ways to teach each child. Instead, in the classic model, a teacher lectures in front of a classroom for a period of time. In the end a lecture type approach may be the only means by which a teacher can communicate the information to their students. Though in the flipped classroom model students arrive ready to fill the holes they have left by the questions about that particular lesson or subject matter. Practice makes perfect but imperfect practice creates bad habits. The idea of creating videos that explain and demonstrate a concept is so valuable because a student can not only self-pace themselves but also have them to refer to at any time they need a refresher.
Having these video’s also makes parent home involvement that much easier. When the parent can see exactly how the teacher is teaching a concept it is far easier to assist a child. Instead, presently a child goes home to tell a parent what they are studying but can’t grasp the concept well enough to explain it to them in the first place.
The value in real useful data on each student’s activities when they return home to practice is extremely beneficial to the teacher. The strategy of separating students into groups based on their understanding of a concept is used quite often, but to be able to break that down even further by what questions they have the most trouble with and so on make individualized teaching far more effective.
When we optimize the process of initially teaching a concept, and ultimately assessing the understanding of those concepts, we are then left with far more time in the middle of that process which should be dedicated to individualized learning for each student with the teacher.
As far as I can see classrooms today, it is obvious something has to change. When it comes to that change it starts and ends with the leader of that classroom, the teacher.
I have seen read various pro’s and con’s to using or not using a flipped classroom approach. Honestly, the issue in my opinion is not to flip or not to flip, it’s to change or not to change. So many teachers go into the profession to inspire children and spark an interest to learn in them. Unfortunately, teaching has changed leaps and bounds from that way that any future teacher has been taught.
So many students look up to a teacher and want to be like them or do the same thing. When that student does become the teacher, simply mimicking that teacher they had is not good enough to becoming an excellent teacher. By the time any individual has gone from student to teacher, it will undoubtedly have been nearly 20 years since they were the student. When it comes to education, history shows us that huge changes occur in even just 5-10 year spans let alone 20 years.
The idea of the flipped classroom is not about the simple concept of a flipped classroom, but it becomes more changing as a teacher from what we grew up with as students. As long as a teacher makes the effort to adapt their teaching, to their students any change is positive. Many doubters of the flipped classroom claim it makes teaching automated. Of course, if the teacher simply puts a video up that is doing their job, it has been automated. I have had plenty of classes where a teacher or professor decides to show the class a film or video clip, is that a flipped classroom? I’ve had teachers who do nothing be lecture and drone on about a subject in a monotone voice, and a script of information that they have no doubt used for years upon years, is that automated thus being flipped?
I believe that changing classroom structures to solely being flipped or totally not flipped is not beneficial for students. What benefits students is any display of passion and authentic excitement from a teacher in any means that teacher chooses to display it. My fondest memories of particular teachers was not the method on which they chose to teach, but how much passion and love for a subject that came out of their creativity in demonstrating the information.
So do we flip or not? Well, I think it gets answered by the best pragmatic response… It all depends.